In
the poem “The Bight” by Elizabeth Bishop, she portrays the recession of waves
across the coastline that make the reader envision being across the waves or
being in the water. She sets the
scene up as if one were traveling across the coastline. She explains the “crumbling ribs” and
the dry boats that come across the area as if one were experiencing it or
viewing it from a movie screen.
Yet, the narrator notes that the “water in the bight doesn’t wet
anything” (5). At this point, one
becomes curious as to what sort of water comes across the coastline that
doesn’t “wet anything.” It makes
the water seem almost sacred or so completely tranquil that it barely comes up
along the coast – it just barely dips at the shore tiptoeing its way across the
sand. This is until the narrator
mentions the unsettling gas that “Pelicans crash into” and is “unnecessarily
hard” (11, 12). She continues with
her depiction of birds as she also describes an extreme tense-like “tremble” to
their open tails like the breaking of a wishbone. The beautiful location masked with tense imagery makes the
scene all the more interesting as she ends the poem by admitting that the
entire area is an oxymoron in the making – it’s “awful but cheerful” (36).
In
the poem “Meditation at Lagunitas” by Robert Hass he considers the etymology,
or derivation of words, as subject to the “thinking” of the time, suggesting
the differing and multiple meaning behind words. The first line of the poem exemplifies just this, reading
“all the new thinking is about loss” (1).
Hass insinuates that many concepts and ideas that people believe are
“new” are ideas taken from previous concepts. In this respect, Hass suggests that “thinking” is all
derived from the thinkers before our time as people choose to shape those
concepts. One can also look at
this line as Hass mocking the innovators of his time, suggesting that the newer
ideas are actually older ones, admitting, “it resembles all the old thinking”
(2). These “new” thinkers are at a
loss for their own ideas. Since
ideas are fabricated and “resemble” this “old thinking” then words, since they
attempt to portray a person’s thoughts, are just as easily fabricated. Hass further explains that these ideas
are not only fabricated from previous ideas, but “that each particular erases /
the luminous clarity of a general idea” (3,4). As Hass suggests, people “erase” one aspect of an idea to
formulate his or her own understanding of a concept.
At
this point, these “general ideas” are warped into multiple ideas from which
Hass suggests, “erases” this “clarity of a general idea”. Hass further exemplifies a person’s
need to continuously probe at a word, through the symbolization of a woodpecker
continuously pecking at a “dead sculpted trunk” (5). Hass’ imagery depicts this “clown-faced woodpecker” not only
as a type of bird, but purposely as the foolish person that continuously tries
to pick away at the meaning of a word.
Hass suggests that this pecking away completely defiles the word as the
woodpecker ceaselessly pecks at a trunk already “sculpted” through other
meanings. The woodpecker tries to
sculpt more shape into the trunk, although it is already “dead” from over-defining
a word. Yet, it is “tragic”
(7) since the clown-faced woodpecker will continuously peck at a “dead” concept
as if it is trying to gain a new means.
This scene depicts a struggle between wanting to attribute so many
different qualities to words, and being stuck in a place where, as the narrator
states, “a word is elegy to what it signifies” (11). Hass also recalls how a woman in this poem is able to remind
him of his childhood memories, describing in vivid details his “childhood
river” (20) to “muddy places where [they] caught the little orange-silver fish
called “pumpkinseed” (22, 23). Since Hass is able to retrieve memories
from seeing her, he parallels the imagery to how words are able to provoke
memories. Furthermore, Hass
creates a certain place where words grant qualities that are capable of
resurrecting memories, thus creating so many different places and experiences
for him and the reader.
The poem “The Bight” by Elizabeth Bishop is a great example of an author portraying setting to the reader. I had never thought of a water's actions and movements in connecction to setting. I agree that Bishop must be referring to a calm body of water when describing it as not really wetting anything . This gives way to an interesting description of her location. Bishop's piece serves as an example of an author using descriptive language and imagery to convey setting.
ReplyDelete